| |
|
|
| Home
>Level Instrumentation |
| |
|
|
| |
Contents
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Summary
of Commonly Used Level Technologies |
| |
| Load
Cells |
Operating Principle: Measure
tank weight with load cells to infer volume
Advantages:
Provides actual mass reading
Doesn't depend on knowing actual tank volume including
internal members and machinery
Disadvantages:
Ensure attachment (piping, supports, ladders, machinery)
don't interfere with loading on load cells.
|
| |
| Floats |
Operating Principle:
Utilizes movement of a float on the liquid surface.
Advantages:
a) Simple
b) Various float configurations are available to provide either a
single point measurement or multiple readings over a limited range.
Disadvantages:
a) Tank contents must not build up on float
b) Density of tank contents must remain constant or recalibration
is required.
|
| |
| Magnetostrictive
level instruments |
Magnetostrictive level instruments are a specialized
float devices.
Operating principle: A donut shaped magnet mounted on the float.
The center of the magnet is installed over a waveguide and an electric
pulse is sent down the waveguide. The magnet interferes with the pulse
to enable sensing liquid level.
Advantages:
a) Provides precise continuous level measurement over a large
range
b) Requires little recalibration
c) Low power consumption so useful for wireless application
d) Can be provided with multiple floats to sense multiple liquid levels
such as oil on water
|
| |
| Vibration |
Operating Principle:
A piezoelectric crystal causes a tuning fork assembly in the tank
to vibrate freely in air. If the sensor becomes immersed in the tank
contents, the vibrations are impeded to provide a point level indication
of tank contents.
Disadvantages:
a) Subject to damage from tank contents
|
| |
| Paddlewheel |
Operating Principle: A
small electric motor rotates a flag or paddlewheel within the tank.
If the sensor becomes immersed in the tank contents, free rotation
of the motor is impeded to provide a point level indication of tank
contents.
Disadvantages:
a) Subject to damage from tank contents
|
| |
|
Differential
Pressure
|
Operating Principle: The head or pressure
exerted on the bottom of the tank by the tank contents is sensed to
provide continuous tank level. If the tank contents are maintained
at atmospheric pressure a simple pressure gauge will indicate pressure.
If the pressure in the tank varies, the high pressure side of a differential
pressure sensor is connected to the tank bottom while the low pressure
side is connected to the vapor space at the top of the tank.
Disadvantages:
a) May not be suitable for liquids that clog instrumentation.
b) Liquid density must remain constant or recalibration is required.
|
| |
|
Capacitance
Probe
|
Operating Principle: The
capacitance of the probe changes when immersed in the tank contents.
The change in capacitance is detected by an electronic circuit to
provide a point level indication of tank contents.
Advantages:
a) No moving parts
b) Wide temperature and pressure operating range
c) Generally requires a single tank penetration and that is at the
top.
d) Some models are capable of distinguishing between tank contents
(Example - oil & water
Disadvantages:
a) Must be chemically compatible with tank contents
b) Changes in dielectric constant of tank contents may necessitate
recalibration
c) Build up of tank contents on probe may necessitate recalibration
or cleaning
|
| |
|
Conductivity
Probes
|
Operating Principle: Uses the conductivity
of the tank contents to provide a point level indication of tank contents.
Advantages:
a) Simple
Disadvantages:
a) Only suitable for conductive liquids
|
| |
|
Thermal Probes
|
Operating Principle: A small electric heater
in the probe tip causes the temperature of the tip to rise. If a liquid
surrounds the tip, the heat is dissipated by the liquid and the temperature
rise is small. If no liquid is present at the tip, the temperature
rise is much higher.
|
| |
|
Light Beam
|
Operating
Principle: Liquid
in the tank obscures the transmission of light between the transmitter
and receiver to provide a point level indication of tank contents.
Disadvantages:
a) Restricted to liquids that reduce the transmission of light
b) Restricted to liquids that drain away from the sensor rather than
collect on it.
|
| |
|
Ultrasonic
|
Operating Principle: A
sound wave is transmitted in free air from the top of the tank down
to the tank contents and the time for the echo to return to the sensor
at the top is recorded to provide a continuous tank level. Alternatively
some models are mounted outside the tank wall. The reflection of sound
by the tank contents, when present, provide a point level indication
of tank contents.
Advantages:
a) Works well for many applications
b) Doesn't require contact with tank contents
c) For continuous level applications access to top of tank only is
generally required.
Disadvantage:
a) May be adversely affected by dust and foam in some applications
b) Limited temperature and pressure range.
|
| |
|
Radar
|
Operating Principle: A
microwave signal is transmitted in free air from the top of the tank
down to the tank contents and the time for the echo to return to the
sensor at the top is recorded to provide a continuous tank level.
Advantages:
a) Generally more precise than ultrasonic
b) Can see through dust and foam better than ultrasonic
c) Operates over a higher temperature and pressure range than ultrasonic
Disadvantages:
a) May not work well with tank contents having low dielectric constant.
b) Can't measure interface between two liquids that don't mix such
as oil and water
|
| |
|
Guided Wave
Radar
|
Operating
Principle:
Similar to radar except instead of propagating through free air,
the radar signal is directed down a wave guide which is in contact
with the tank contents.
Advantages:
a) Suitable for contents having low dielectric constants
b) Calibration can be done without the tank contents being present
Disadvantages:
a) Waveguide must be compatible with tank contents.
b) Adequate headspace above tank is required for installation of rigid
type waveguides
c) Waveguide is subject to damage by equipment such as agitator in
the tank
d) If the waveguide comes loose, damage to tank equipment agitation
and conveying systems may result.
|
| |
|
Nuclear
|
Operating Principle: A
gamma ray source is mounted on one side of the tank and detectors
are mounted on the opposite side of the tank. The attenuation of the
gamma ray radiation by the tank contents is detected at the detectors
to provide point level indication
Advantages:
a) No tank penetrations are required
b) No contact with tank contents so compatibility probes are eliminated
Disadvantages:
a) Expensive
b) Requires special training and licensing
|
| |
The
above table is based on information compiled from the following articles.
Please see them for a more detailed evaluation:
Choosing
Level Sensors - P. Welander - Control Engineering
Keep
Measurements on the Level - A. Sloley - Chemical Processing
|
| |
| Glossary |
| |
Glossary
of Terms - Burkert Fluid Control
- Level and other instrumentation terms
|
|
| |
|
|
| Level
Calculators, Tables, & Tools |
| |
Tank
Capacity Calculators - Water
& Wastewater
Specific Gravity Lookup Calculator
- Magnetrol Orion
Dielectric
Constant Lookup - Magnetrol Orion
Corrosion
Resistance - Magnetrol Orion
Technical
Handbook - Chemical
Processing/Magnetrol
Density
Concentration Tables - Mettler
Toledo
Dielectric Constant Chart - ASI Instruments
Bulk
Density and Specific Gravity Chart - ASI Instruments
Dielectric
Constants - K-Tek
Typical
Specific Gravities - K-Tek
Density
Unit Converter: - Eesiflo - Convert between different density
units
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
General
|
|
| |
A
Dozen Ways to Measure Fluid Level and How They Work
-K. Hambrice/H. Hopper - Sensors Online
Keep measurements on the level
- J. Boisvert - Siemens/Chemical
Processing
Introduction to Level Measurement
-SearchEng
Level
Measurement and Inventory Tank Gauging
- J. Taylor - Control Engineering
|
|
| |
|
|
| Laser
Level Measurement |
|
See also Laser
Displacement Sensors
|
| |
| |
Manufacturers |
|
| |
Following
are some popular manufacturers.
*
Indicates manufacturer received Control Magazine's Reader's Choice
Award. Please refer to the complete survey in Control
Magazine, Jan 2005).
|
|
| |
|
|
| Electrical
Properties |
| *
Ametek Drexelbrook |
| *
Endress + Hauser |
| *
Emerson Process-Rosemount |
| |
*
Magnetrol |
|
| |
| |
Float/Displacer
Type
|
|
| |
*
Emerson Process - Fischer Controls |
|
| |
*
Magnetrol Orion |
|
| |
*
Danaher Gems Sensors |
|
| |
*
K-Tek |
|
|
*
Dresser Masoneilan
|
| |
|
|
| TDR
Radar |
| |
*
Ohmart Vega |
|
| |
*
Emerson Process-Rosemount |
|
| |
*
Endress + Hauser |
|
|
*
Magnetrol
|
| |
*
Krohne |
|
| |
*
Krohne |
|
| |
| |
Non-Contact
Radar
|
|
| |
*
Ohmart Vega |
|
| *
Emerson Process- SAAB Rosemount |
| |
*
Endress + Hauser |
|
| *
Siemens-Milltronics |
| |
| Ultrasonic |
| *
Siemens-Milltronics |
| *
Endress + Hauser |
| *
Magnetrol |
| *
Ohmart Vega |
| *
Emerson Process- SAAB Rosemount |
| *
Flowline |
| |
| Point |
|
*
Endress + Hauser
|
| *
AMETEK Drexelbrook |
|
*
Magnetrol
|
| *
SOR |
| *
Thermoelectron (Sesall) |
| |
| Visual
Level Indicator |
| *
Magnetrol-Orion |
| *
K-Tek |
| *
Penberthy |
| *
Clark-Reliance (Jerguson) |
| *
Emerson Process Brooks |
| |
| Level
Switches |
| Kayden |
| Sika |
| Harwil |
| |
| |
|
Please support
our contributors
For a complete product and manufacturer listing
visit the ISA
directory
|
| |
|
|
Copyright
© 2004 by Controls Weekly | Legal |
Last Modified: April 4, 2008
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |